ExploreRead
Pardons, Dropped Cases and Cover-Ups
Trump's Blanket Pardons

Trump Freed January 6 Leaders Serving 18 and 22 Years, Then Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort

Select a Section to Explore

Chapter 1 — Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack

Chapter 2 — He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort

Chapter 3 — Victims Paid for the Clemency

Chapter 4 — Broad Power Does Not End Accountability

1 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack

1 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack — select a subtopic

1.1 — Eighteen Years and Twenty-Two Years, Cut Short

1.2 — Fourteen Commutations and a Blanket Pardon

1.3 — The Reconciliation He Promised

1.4 — DOJ Had Twelve Defendants' Convictions Set Aside

1 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack
1.1 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack
Eighteen Years and Twenty-Two Years, Cut Short

On his first day back in office, Trump ordered freedom for leaders convicted of plotting to stop the transfer of presidential power by force; Reuters reported their release the next day. Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes had received eighteen years in prison; Proud Boys chairman Enrique Tarrio had received twenty-two. Trump commuted Rhodes's sentence and pardoned Tarrio. Attorney General Merrick Garland said 140 officers were assaulted.

DOJ press release, "Proud Boys Leader Sentenced to 22 Years in Prison for Seditious Conspiracy and Other Charges"

Make no mistake . . . we did this.

Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, Proud Boys national chairman (quoted in DOJ press release) · September 5, 2023

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

1.2 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack
Fourteen Commutations and a Blanket Pardon

Trump named fourteen people whose sentences he reduced to time served, then pardoned everyone else convicted of an offense related to January 6. He ordered the immediate release of convicted defendants still in prison and directed the Attorney General to seek permanent dismissal of pending indictments. The pardon made no exception for violence against police. The Democratic staff of the House Judiciary Committee described it as covering roughly 1,500 people.

Presidential Proclamation, "Granting Pardons and Commutation of Sentences for Certain Offenses Relating to the Events at or Near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021"

grant a full, complete and unconditional pardon to all other individuals convicted of offenses related to events that occurred at or near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021

Donald J. Trump, Presidential Proclamation · January 20, 2025

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

1.3 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack
The Reconciliation He Promised

Trump said his January 6 proclamation would begin national reconciliation. Hundreds of prisoners were released, Reuters reported. An Ipsos poll soon afterward found 62% opposed pardoning January 6 participants.

Presidential Proclamation, "Granting Pardons and Commutation of Sentences for Certain Offenses Relating to the Events at or Near the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021"

This proclamation ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation

Donald J. Trump, Presidential Proclamation · January 20, 2025

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

1.4 · Trump Freed the Leaders of the Attack
DOJ Had Twelve Defendants' Convictions Set Aside

Trump's Justice Department later obtained removal of the convictions against eight Oath Keepers, including Rhodes, and against four Proud Boys whose sentences he had commuted. Mehta noted that two cooperating defendants, Joshua James and Brian Ulrich, still had seditious-conspiracy convictions: DOJ had not explained why their convictions remained while those of the eight trial defendants were cleared; the district judges permanently dismissed the cases while saying they disagreed with the decision. Kelly said Trump's proclamation required dismissal once the appeals court had vacated the convictions, leaving the indictment pending again. Judge Amit Mehta said DOJ had not claimed insufficient evidence, prosecutorial misconduct or a violation of defendants' rights; he also noted that DOJ had not said Trump authorized relief beyond his commutations.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

2 · He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort

2 · He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort — select a subtopic

2.1 — The Scheme Was His

2.2 — A Pardon for Everyone Except Trump

2.3 — Tina Peters: The Pardon Failed in State Court

2 · He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort
2.1 · He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort
The Scheme Was His

The House January 6 committee found that Trump oversaw an effort to substitute fake electors in seven states he lost. His own senior campaign lawyers backed away from it. Two states' documents were conditional, and some participants did not understand how their votes would be used, but the committee found that the plan aimed to replace Biden's legitimate electoral votes.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

2.2 · He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort
A Pardon for Everyone Except Trump

In November 2025, Trump pardoned all United States citizens for a broad category of conduct involving 2020 presidential electors, including the fake-elector effort. He named allies including Rudolph Giuliani, John Eastman and Mark Meadows, while expressly excluding himself. The grant reached federal offenses, not state crimes.

Proclamation 10989, "Granting Pardons for Certain Offenses Related to the 2020 Presidential Election" (Federal Register, 90 FR 51071)

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, do hereby grant a full, complete, and unconditional pardon to all United States citizens for conduct relating to the advice, creation, organization, execution, submission, support, voting, activities, participation in, or advocacy for or of any slate or proposed slate of Presidential electors, whether or not recognized by any State or State official, in connection with the 2020 Presidential Election, as well for any conduct relating to their efforts to expose voting fraud and vulnerabilities in the 2020 Presidential Election.

Donald J. Trump, Presidential Proclamation · November 7, 2025
Proclamation 10989, "Granting Pardons for Certain Offenses Related to the 2020 Presidential Election" (Federal Register, 90 FR 51071)

This pardon does not apply to the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.

Donald J. Trump, Presidential Proclamation · November 7, 2025

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

2.3 · He Pardoned the Fake-Elector Effort
Tina Peters: The Pardon Failed in State Court

Trump also pardoned Tina Peters, the Colorado election official convicted after a breach of her county's voting system. Colorado's appeals court ruled that his pardon had no effect on her state offenses, while overturning her sentence because the judge improperly considered protected speech. The Associated Press reported that Trump successfully pressured Governor Jared Polis into commuting her sentence, leading to her release from prison.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

3 · Victims Paid for the Clemency

3 · Victims Paid for the Clemency — select a subtopic

3.1 — Punishment and Restitution

3.2 — Mercy Was Available; Blanket Clemency Was a Choice

3 · Victims Paid for the Clemency
3.2 · Victims Paid for the Clemency
Mercy Was Available; Blanket Clemency Was a Choice

Trump had granted mercy one case at a time: he commuted Alice Marie Johnson's sentence, later pardoned her, and appointed her to recommend commutations. NPR reported that she emphasized community safety and support for people leaving prison. The January 6 proclamation instead covered everyone convicted of related offenses, including violence against police. Lawfare identified five recipients whose subsequent crimes or alleged crimes occurred while they otherwise would still have been imprisoned or detained.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources

4 · Broad Power Does Not End Accountability

4 · Broad Power Does Not End Accountability — select a subtopic

4.1 — The Strongest Defense

4.2 — Why This Is an Impeachment Case

4 · Broad Power Does Not End Accountability
4.1 · Broad Power Does Not End Accountability
The Strongest Defense

The Constitution gives the President broad authority to pardon federal crimes, and the Supreme Court has held that Congress cannot reduce that power by statute. Alexander Hamilton defended clemency as a protection against excessive punishment and a possible way to restore peace after rebellion. That is a serious defense of mercy, but the Supreme Court also identified impeachment as a response to abuse of the power.

Schick v. Reed, 419 U.S. 256 (opinion)

the power flows from the Constitution alone, not from any legislative enactments, and that it cannot be modified, abridged, or diminished by the Congress.

Supreme Court of the United States, Schick v. Reed, 419 U.S. 256 (1974) · 1974

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

4.2 · Broad Power Does Not End Accountability
Why This Is an Impeachment Case

The charge is that Trump abused a public trust: he removed prison punishment for convicted January 6 leaders and pardoned the election effort the House committee found he had overseen. The Framers discussed the danger of a president pardoning crimes he had advised, and Madison identified impeachment as a safeguard. Democratic staff said the January 6 pardons erased $2.6 million in unpaid restitution.

Debates in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 18, 1788 (Elliot's Debates, vol. 3)

If the President be connected in any suspicious manner with any persons, and there be grounds to believe he will shelter himself; the House of Representatives can impeach him

James Madison, Virginia Ratifying Convention · June 18, 1788

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Full Source Index

Full Source Index — 40 Sources

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Source Index