ExploreRead
Immigration Without Due Process
Shooting Evidence

Trump's Agencies Accused the People Their Agents Shot and Withheld Evidence of Two Killings for Months

Select a Section to Explore

Chapter 1 — DHS Kept Its Accusation After DOJ Abandoned the Case

Chapter 2 — Two Minneapolis Killings and Months Without Federal Evidence

Chapter 3 — Two More Deaths, Then Trump's Order to Keep Traffic Stops

Chapter 4 — The Accusations and Evidence Gaps Recurred

Chapter 5 — The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire

1 · DHS Kept Its Accusation After DOJ Abandoned the Case

1 · DHS Kept Its Accusation After DOJ Abandoned the Case — select a subtopic

1.1 — The Government's Own Evidence Broke Its Story

1.2 — The County's Account of a Shot Through a Door

1.3 — The Charges Changed Sides

1 · DHS Kept Its Accusation After DOJ Abandoned the Case
1.1 · DHS Kept Its Accusation After DOJ Abandoned the Case
The Government's Own Evidence Broke Its Story

DHS accused a man its officer had shot of attacking the officer. DOJ dropped the prosecution because new evidence contradicted the sworn account, but DHS left its accusation online. Trump publicly praised the secretary who defended that account.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources
1.3 · DHS Kept Its Accusation After DOJ Abandoned the Case
The Charges Changed Sides

DOJ permanently abandoned the assault case against Sosa-Celis and Aljorna. The officer now faces state charges and a federal false-statement indictment. News reporting also documents a prosecutor's objection to DOJ's charging decision and his firing, while DOJ said the civil-rights inquiry was unfinished.

Government's Motion to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice, United States v. Aljorna and Sosa-Celis, ECF 48

Newly discovered evidence in this matter is materially inconsistent with the allegations in the Complaint Affidavit, filed on January 16, 2026, as ECF 1-1, as well as the preliminary-hearing testimony (ECF 18, 19) that was based on information presented to the Affiant. Accordingly, dismissal with prejudice will serve the interests of justice.

Daniel N. Rosen, United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota, by Assistant United States Attorney Syngen Kanassatega · February 11, 2026

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources

2 · Two Minneapolis Killings and Months Without Federal Evidence

2 · Two Minneapolis Killings and Months Without Federal Evidence — select a subtopic

2.1 — Renee Good: An Accusation Before an Independent Investigation

2.2 — Alex Pretti: State Investigators Turned Away With a Warrant

2 · Two Minneapolis Killings and Months Without Federal Evidence
2.1 · Two Minneapolis Killings and Months Without Federal Evidence
Renee Good: An Accusation Before an Independent Investigation

ICE killed Renee Good in her car. DHS immediately accused her of trying to kill officers, and the FBI excluded Minnesota's investigators that afternoon. Congressional letters also allege denied medical access and an investigation redirected toward Good's widow.

DHS post, status 2008958123092979817, archived platform record

Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them—an act of domestic terrorism.

United States Department of Homeland Security · January 7, 2026

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources
2.2 · Two Minneapolis Killings and Months Without Federal Evidence
Alex Pretti: State Investigators Turned Away With a Warrant

Federal officers killed Alex Pretti, and Minnesota's investigators never examined the scene despite obtaining a search warrant. A judge concluded evidence likely had been lost or spoiled there, more likely because of urgent safety conditions than poor evidence-gathering, and inferred that federal officials had failed to safeguard Pretti's firearm. He ended the preservation order because future destruction was unlikely. Federal authorities later shared evidence with Minnesota.

Sworn declaration, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension v. Noem, ECF 5, paragraph 20

After the FBI cleared the scene without providing the BCA access, local and state law enforcement officers were unable to hold the scene, and it was overrun by individuals in the area. The BCA was thus unable to examine the scene.

Drew Evans, Superintendent, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension · January 24, 2026

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources

3 · Two More Deaths, Then Trump's Order to Keep Traffic Stops

3 · Two More Deaths, Then Trump's Order to Keep Traffic Stops — select a subtopic

3.1 — Houston: ICE Detained the Witnesses

3.2 — Maine: The Secretary Corrected the Target's Identity

3.3 — Trump Rejected the Pause; Investigative Independence Came Under Pressure

3 · Two More Deaths, Then Trump's Order to Keep Traffic Stops
3.2 · Two More Deaths, Then Trump's Order to Keep Traffic Stops
Maine: The Secretary Corrected the Target's Identity

An ICE officer killed Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Biddeford. Mullin initially told Senator Angus King the dead man was the warrant target, then corrected that information. Maine's attorney general continued investigating the homicide and use of deadly force.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

3.3 · Two More Deaths, Then Trump's Order to Keep Traffic Stops
Trump Rejected the Pause; Investigative Independence Came Under Pressure

After the Houston and Maine deaths, ICE paused most vehicle stops for a safety review. Trump publicly told ICE to keep using them. CBS later reported instructions shifting assault investigations involving DHS officers to ICE's own investigators; DHS and DOJ denied a policy change.

Truth Social post of July 15, 2026, reproduced by the American Presidency Project

I.C.E., be judicious, fair and smart, and go back and do your very important job.

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States · July 15, 2026

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

4 · The Accusations and Evidence Gaps Recurred

4 · The Accusations and Evidence Gaps Recurred — select a subtopic

4.1 — Chicago: Martinez's Prosecution Ended, Her Accusation Stayed

4.2 — Austin: An Assault Charge Without a Recording of the Gunfire

4.3 — New York: A Child in the Car, and an Emergency Court Order

4 · The Accusations and Evidence Gaps Recurred
4.1 · The Accusations and Evidence Gaps Recurred
Chicago: Martinez's Prosecution Ended, Her Accusation Stayed

Border Patrol shot Marimar Martinez, and DHS named her in a release about domestic terrorists. The Texas Tribune reported that video and agents' texts contradicted the vehicle-ramming accusation, and the government dropped her prosecution permanently. The accusations remained on the department's website.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

4.2 · The Accusations and Evidence Gaps Recurred
Austin: An Assault Charge Without a Recording of the Gunfire

ICE shot delivery driver Wilber Garces Perez after a pursuit. The shooter said Garces Perez tried to strike him with the car; Garces Perez said an SUV forced his car to stop before the officer fired. His criminal case proceeded, but the hearing exposed missing recordings and an investigator who had not interviewed the shooter.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

5 · The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire

5 · The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire — select a subtopic

5.1 — The Defense Has Limits

5.2 — The Prosecutions Failed; Officials Later Shared Evidence

5.3 — Why This Is an Abuse of Public Trust

5 · The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire
5.1 · The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire
The Defense Has Limits

Deadly force can be lawful when an officer faces a serious threat, and federal law shields officers and agencies from many prosecutions and lawsuits, though neither makes an official accusation true. DHS's own litigation-disclosure rule leaves sharing with state criminal investigators unaffected.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources
5.2 · The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire
The Prosecutions Failed; Officials Later Shared Evidence

DOJ charged people federal agents had shot, and the Sosa-Celis and Martinez cases ended in permanent dismissal. The administration later shared evidence and prosecuted Castro, and Noem and Bondi left office. Those corrections did not restore the months investigators lost or correct DHS's accusation.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources
5.3 · The President's Responsibility After the Gunfire
Why This Is an Abuse of Public Trust

The impeachment argument concerns the administration's conduct after the shootings and Trump's public backing. The charge is abuse of public trust: officials accused people their agents shot while restricting independent scrutiny.

Read the full chapter — all the detail, fully footnoted →

Sources

Full Source Index

Full Source Index — 100 Sources

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Source Index